Agentic SDLC Transformation

Your engineers have Claude Code or Codex. The engineering practice behind them doesn’t exist yet. We embed with your teams for 8–12 weeks, install one agentic coding standard built on RACE Programming, and hand back the numbers that show what changed.

~24%

—  more merged PRs among adopters of agentic CLI coding tools

~3×

—  the spread between teams with the same licenses; the variable is practice

Week 1

— baseline captured on your own delivery data

2 agents

— Claude Code and OpenAI Codex, one standard

THE PROBLEM

Why Agentic Coding Stalls Without an Agentic SDLC

AI-assisted software development is already everywhere; an AI SDLC is not. Speeding up coding alone lifts that one stage by 30–40%, but team productivity by less than 10% while planning, review and testing stay manual.

Adoption is solved.
84% of developers already use or plan to use AI coding tools.
Attribution is not.
Companies trace about a third of AI spend to an outcome.
Results vary 3×.
Same licenses, same agents, different engineering practice.

Risk is growing.
Token cost, code quality, and who answers for what an agent shipped.

What engineering leaders need?

Governed – one engineering standard, not ten personal ones.

Measured – delivery outcomes attributed to the spend that produced them.

Accountable – a review discipline built for agentic output and a named owner for every decision an agent makes.

HOW WE SOLVE IT

One Agentic Engineering Standard for Claude Code and OpenAI Codex

MODEL-AGNOSTIC

—Claude Code (Anthropic)Codex (OpenAI)

Repo context

CLAUDE.md standardAGENTS.md standard

Reusable team know-how

Skills, subagents, hooksSkills, AGENTS.md conventions

Integrations

MCP servers: Git, CI/CD, issue tracker, docsMCP servers: Git, CI/CD, issue tracker, docs

Where it runs

Terminal, IDE, CICLI, IDE, cloud tasks

Model policy

Which model per task type, written into the playbookWhich model per task type, written into the playbook

Why one standard, two agents:

No lock-in
Specs and playbooks live in your repos as plain files. Switch or mix agents without rewriting how you work.
Right agent per task
Teams can run different agents for different work under one review and cost policy.
Neutral advice
We don’t resell licenses or earn on tokens. As a Select Anthropic Partner we bring deep Claude Code expertise, and we deliver the same standard on Codex.

OUR APPROACH

RACE Programming: The AI SDLC Framework Behind the Program

RACE Programming (Reliable Agentic Coding Excellence) is First Line Software’s AI SDLC framework for agentic engineering. Agile coordinates people. RACE manages a team where a new member has joined: the Silicon Software Engineer. It was developed and proven on our own production work before we offered it to anyone.

Prescriptive, not permissive. Every role, artifact and ceremony is specified, not suggested.

Executable User Stories. Our form of spec-driven development: one source of truth that engineers and agents read the same way.

Defined roles. Pit Wall and Pit Crew set who decides, who reviews and who answers for what an agent ships.

Stints. Short delivery units sized for agent execution under human review.

In our own delivery, RACE takes an idea to production in 2–3 days and gives about 3× the output for the same budget. Read the full framework at raceprogramming.com.

Explore RACE Programming

What an Agentic SDLC Transformation Installs

We don’t sell licenses and we don’t teach buttons. We install SDLC automation using agentic AI as one managed engineering practice, measured against your own delivery data.

Goes into your teams:

Executable User Stories, not prompts

one source of truth for engineers and agents

An embedded Forward Deployed Engineer

sets architecture and the quality bar with your tech leads, inside your sprints and codebase. Remote, no on-site premium

Claude Code or Codex as the agent workforce

code, tests, DevOps and docs generated under your team’s review

Review discipline

PR checklist, test strategy, code-turnover metric

Stays with you:

Adoption and cost dashboard

active vs. provisioned seats, spend by team, model mix, next to cycle time and PR throughput. Built on your systems

Encoded playbook

CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md standard, spec workflow, PR checklist and model policy, version-controlled in your repos

ROI report

measured against the week-one baseline. Nothing depends on FLS staying in the loop
Anthropic Official Select Services Partner

THE PROGRAM

The Program: Four Phases, 8–12 Weeks

Baseline & Map

Week 1-2.

Audit usage, spend and practice; agree target metrics.

Deliverable: adoption baseline.

Embed & practice

Week 3-6.

your FDE pairs on real tickets under RACE Programming.

Deliverable: merged PRs + practice notes.

Encode & standardize

Week 7-8.

What worked for the first teams becomes the org standard.

Deliverable: encoded playbook.

Visibility & handover

Week 9–10.

Before/after numbers your board can read unassisted.

Deliverable: dashboard + ROI report.

Engagement Options

Fixed fee. Three packages, same method; what changes is scope.

Starter

1–2 teams · 8 weeks · 1 embedded FDE, 3 days/week

Prove the model on one high-visibility team.

Standard

4–6 teams · 10 weeks · 2 embedded FDEs

Cross-team model policy + adoption and cost dashboard

Enterprise

org-wide · 12 weeks+ · dedicated team and program manager

Governance policy, full skills library, board reporting cadence.

FIT CHECKWho Agentic SDLC Transformation Is For

Not for

You haven’t licensed a coding agent yet — start with an evaluation

You want a product built from zero — that’s Rapid AI Delivery (Race Mode) →

You want AI workflows for Legal, Finance or Sales — that’s AI Enablement Services

You want a training course with certificates

Best for

You hold Claude Code or OpenAI Codex licenses 

and the spend is material

Leadership asks for an ROI answer

and you don’t have one

Practice varies team to team

and you want one standard

You have production code

and real review load

AI Enablement Services Packages:
From One Function to Org-Wide

All packages follow the same method at a fixed fee;
what changes is the number of functions in scope. Claude or OpenAI.

Starter
1 function, 6 weeks

Best for: a motivated champion team that needs a credible win before broader rollout.

1 Enabler · 2 days/week · 1 champion team

✓ Enablement Blueprint

✓ Capability Assessment (before / after)

✓ Validated skill pack

✓ Admin-provisioned plugin bundle

✓ ROI Report

✓ Handover Package

Select Starter

Standard
3 functions, 9 weeks

Best for: organizations with several departments ready to move

1 Enabler · 2 days/week · 1 champion team

✓ All Starter deliverables × 3 functions

✓ Cross-function workflow stacking

✓ Opportunity Brief

Select Standard

Enterprise
5+ functions, 12 weeks+

Best for: org-wide transformation with board-level accountability

Dedicated team + program manager

✓ All Standard deliverables × 5 functions

✓ Company workflow library

✓ Operating Model Blueprint

✓ FLS Claw agents

✓ MAIS Opportunity Brief

Select Enterprise

Why First Line Software

Our own framework, proven in production

RACE Programming was built and validated on FLS delivery work before we sold it.

Claude Code and Codex, one standard

Select Anthropic Partner depth, without locking you into one vendor.

Measured honestly

Public benchmarks put the median gain near 7–8% and the measured ceiling near 24%. We report where you actually land, including if it’s low.

Fixed-price. Not T&M

Scope, timeline and price agreed before we start.

Agentic SDLC FAQ

What is agentic SDLC?

An agentic SDLC (agentic software development lifecycle) is a way of delivering software where AI coding agents such as Claude Code or Codex do much of the coding, testing and documentation, while engineers write specs, review output and own decisions. It needs defined roles, executable specs, review discipline and metrics, not just agent licenses.

How is this different from training engineers on Claude Code or Codex?

Tool training improves how engineers prompt. An agentic SDLC transformation changes the delivery process itself: spec-driven, role-based, agent-executed, measured. Same licenses, different operating model. An embedded engineer works on your real tickets under RACE Programming, and the result is reported against your own delivery data.

Do you work with OpenAI Codex or only Claude Code?

Both. The engineering standard sits above the agent: the same specs, review checklist, model policy and metrics apply to Claude Code and Codex. First Line Software is a Select Anthropic Partner, but we don’t resell licenses, so we recommend the agent that fits each team and task.

Will agentic coding reduce our AI spend or increase it?

Either is possible, and both are fine as long as you can see which and why. Model policy and context discipline lower cost per outcome; higher throughput can raise total spend. At the end you can state cost per merged PR instead of cost per seat.

How do you measure whether it worked?

Against your own week-one baseline: PR throughput, cycle time, review load and code-turnover ratio, next to spend. Public benchmarks for agentic CLI coding tools put the median near 7–8% and the measured ceiling near 24%. We report where you actually land, including if it is low.

What about code quality, and what do we own at the end?

Agentic output needs a stricter review standard than human code, so the quality number is reported next to the velocity number. Every CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, skill and playbook lives in your version control, and the dashboard runs on your data. No dependency on FLS.

The agent licenses are already paid for. An agentic SDLC is what makes them pay back.

Book a Discovery Call

  • Thirty minutes with the engineers who would run it — not a sales call. Bring your admin console numbers from Claude Code or Codex, and we’ll tell you whether this is worth doing.